Sunday, August 31, 2008

Who goes first: Clinton’s supporters clash with Obama has roots in history



Believe it or not, the anger among supporters of Hillary Clinton, who felt their presidential candidate was robbed of her rightful place on the Democratic ticket by the upstart Obama, is a show we’ve seen before.
It took place long before the days of YouTube and the 24 hour news cycle, long before anyone ever imagined a black man or a white woman would ever be on a presidential ticket of a major American political party.
It was in the days when neither blacks nor women had the right to vote, but had begun the long battle for universal suffrage. Both blacks and women would eventually get there, but not at the same time. And the fight led to a breach between two stalwarts of the 19th century civil rights movement, Frederick Douglass and Susan B. Anthony.
Douglass, anti-slavery abolitionist, was a supporter of women’s right to vote, and he attended the famous Seneca Falls Women‘s Rights Convention. The passage of the 14th amendment to the Constitution in 1865 had given blacks their status U.S. citizens, and in combination with the abolition of slavery, they had begun the struggle for the right to vote.
By 1869, the long-time friends in the struggle Frederick Douglass and Susan B. Anthony were on opposite sides of the debate because the 15th Amendment granted suffrage rights to blacks as males. Anthony questioned why women should support this amendment when black men were not continuing to show support for women’s voting rights. "When women because they are women are dragged from their homes and hung upon lampposts, .....then they will have the urgency to obtain the ballot," Douglass said. Despite Douglass’ obvious logic, that one didn’t go over big with Anthony.
In the end, it would not be until the 20th century that either women or African-Americans received full voting rights. Now, in the 21st century, Clinton putting cracks in a “glass ceiling”, and with Sen. Barack Obama poised to do what most of us could never have dreamed or imagined, the fight over who should be first is a strange echo of a distant past.

Friday, August 29, 2008

McCain hopes his VP pick will make women fall for him


Just hours after Sen. Barack Obama's historic nomination and magnificent acceptance speech, it was McCain's turn to seize the spotlight with his 'maverick" VP choice.

And the winner is ……Gov. Sarah Palin, of Alaska, a 44 year old, gun-toting "hockey mom.''
Palin who is two years into her first term as a governor, has had no presence on the national scene until now. She has no foreign policy credentials or insider Washington knowledge - all the things the McCain campaign and the press have hounded Obama about.

But none of that is important now – what is important is that she is a woman, which means that all those disaffected Hillary Clinton voters will now jump ship and switch to supporting a woman who disagrees with Democrats (and pro-choice independents) on almost every issue. She is a cynical choice by a presidential nominee who has obstructed women's rights for much of his time in the Senate, who was confounded when recently asked if insurance companies should be made to pay for contraception for women the same way they pay for Viagra for over-the hill men.

As expected, the equally cynical pundits are praising McCain for his "stunning" and "brilliant' choice. "Out of box!,'' cried one; "History-making!" cried others. McCain's thinking is apparently that women supported Hillary Clinton simply because she was a female. Therefore, if he picks a woman, the Republican party will appear to be making progress on women's issues and women will drop the cause of Democratic unity and flock to his campaign.

But Hillary Clinton was not just a token female candidate – she has been a presence on the national scene. Clinton's historic run for the presidency was made possible because she was the first former First Lady to be elected to public office in her own right. She was the inevitable Democratic nominee, until Obama came along. She had been in the trenches and fought the big boys.

And what of other prominent Republican women in the House or Senate and were possibly passed over? The story of how Palin came to be VP has yet to be told, but it will be interesting to find out if any Republican women with national credentials were considered. My guess is probably not.
Will Hillary Clinton's disaffected supporters make the switch? It depends on their answer to the question Clinton asked during the convention; "Were you in it only for me?''
During the lead-up to his vice presidential pick, Sen. Barack Obama called his vice presidential selection "the first and most important decision I will make as president.'' If that's so, then McCain just flunked his first test.--